Assess your organisation’s readiness for implementing change. This tool helps identify potential barriers and enablers before starting your TRIP project. Page 1 of 9Implementation Readiness AssessmentThis tool has been designed to assess organisational readiness and capacity for implementing and evaluating new healthcare initiatives. It considers various contextual and individual factors to facilitate successful implementation and evaluation of innovative models of care. The assessment tool is divided into two sections: Part A: Background Information Provide details about your project, including its objectives, target population, and team. Part B: Factors Influencing Implementation Rate your project over a range of context specific and individual factors that influence implementation, across six domains: Domains Innovation characteristics Outer setting Inner setting Individuals Implementation process Outcomes At the end of the assessment you will receive a summary of your readiness scores with a radar chart that shows strengths and areas for improvement. NextPart A: Background InformationProject Name*Problem Statement*Primary Objective*Secondary ObjectivesProject TeamProgram LocationGroup/PopulationDate*BackNextPart B: Readiness AssessmentDomain 1: Innovation CharacteristicsRate each statement on a scale of 1 to 5.1 = Strongly Disagree / No Evidence 5 = Strongly Agree / Extensive Evidence1. Is there strong evidence to support the implementation?Evidence support*1 = No evidence, 5 = Extensive evidence12345Comments / Notes2. Is there strong support from stakeholders?Stakeholder support*1 = No support, 5 = Full support12345Comments / Notes3. The innovation is compatible with existing practicesCompatibility with existing practices*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes4. The innovation can be easily adapted to local contextAdaptability to local context*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / NotesBackNextDomain 2: External FactorsRate each statement on a scale of 1 to 5.1 = Strongly Disagree / No Funding 5 = Strongly Agree / Full Funding5. There are supportive policies and regulationsSupportive policies and regulations*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes6. External partnerships are availableExternal partnerships*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes7. Market/community demand existsMarket/community demand*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes8. Socio-cultural factors are favourableSocio-cultural factors*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes9. Adequate funding is availableAdequate funding*1 = No funding, 5 = Full funding12345Comments / NotesBackNextDomain 3: Internal FactorsRate each statement on a scale of 1 to 5.1 = Strongly Disagree 5 = Strongly Agree10. Leadership actively supports the implementationLeadership support*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes11. Organisational culture is conducive to changeOrganisational culture*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes12. Adequate resources are availableAdequate resources*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes13. Existing infrastructure can support implementationInfrastructure support*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes14. There is capacity for ongoing quality improvementQuality improvement capacity*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes15. Communication channels are effectiveCommunication channels*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / NotesBackNextDomain 4: PeopleRate each statement on a scale of 1 to 5.1 = None 5 = All Stakeholder groups to consider: Patients / consumers / carers Clinical staff (allied health, medical, nursing) Support staff Management / leadership External partners Policy makers / decision makers Education / training institutions 16. Key stakeholders have been identified and engagedStakeholder identification and engagement*1 = None, 5 = All12345Comments / Notes17. Staff have the necessary skills and trainingStaff skills and training*1 = None, 5 = All12345Comments / Notes18. There is a dedicated implementation teamDedicated implementation team*1 = None, 5 = All12345Comments / Notes19. End users have been involved in planningEnd user involvement*1 = None, 5 = All12345Comments / Notes20. Champions/advocates have been identifiedChampions and advocates*1 = None, 5 = All12345Comments / NotesBackNextDomain 5: Implementation ProcessRate each statement on a scale of 1 to 5.1 = Strongly Disagree 5 = Strongly Agree21. A clear implementation plan existsClear implementation plan*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes22. Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms are in placeMonitoring and evaluation*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes23. A communication strategy has been developedCommunication strategy*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes24. Risk management strategies are definedRisk management*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / NotesBackNextDomain 6: Outcomes & PerformanceRate each statement on a scale of 1 to 5.1 = Strongly Disagree 5 = Strongly Agree25. Expected outcomes are clearly definedExpected outcomes defined*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes26. Baseline data has been collectedBaseline data collected*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes27. Key performance indicators are establishedKPIs established*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes28. Data collection methods are definedData collection methods*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes29. Sustainability plans are in placeSustainability plans*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / Notes30. Success criteria have been agreed uponSuccess criteria agreed*1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree12345Comments / NotesBackNextYour Readiness Assessment Results Interpretation guide: 1.00 – 2.99: Not yet ready — significant work is needed before implementation can proceed 3.00 – 3.99: Promising — some areas need further attention before proceeding 4.00 – 5.00: Ready — well-positioned for implementation BackPrintThis field should be left blank